Why Not Trust Obama?
Why Not Trust Obama?Share
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Tags: conspiracy, government, obama
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by kevin on -
your right you are not my enemy i just view the situation a little diffrently i actually think its a good thing that you take it upon your self to do some actual research than sit back and be told what to think. i just dont think you shouldnt be putting such little faith in the man thats trying his best to get this situation under control i dont think that anyone can fix the problem over night.
but i did also notice the talk off another bank bail out for about 1.5 trillion dollars thats alot of money and if they give it back to the people that put you in the situation your country is in now then you really got a problem on your hands. the greedy just get more greedy.
and i wasnt directing that fox news thing towards you i just hate hearing when people say i broke into tears or almost got sick because he became president i apolagize if i offended you.I just cant understand why people are being so hard on him when he hasnt been president for a month yet he cant fix everything at once one issue at a time hopfully he does what he says i think you should just give him some more time.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on -
I really appreciate your response. As you can tell from some of the other responses, I get attacked all too frequently. With saying that, let me give you an example of both sides of the issue that I witnessed last night in his Pres. Address.
He made the curious statement that we are facing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and we need to hurry up and pass this stimulus bill. Oddly enough, Pelosi wrote this Bill long before Obama was in office, but that is besides the point of this note. He is wrong. The worst economic crisis to face this nation since the G.D., was during the Carter administration, when unemployment reached >20%. Today we have not reached 10%. The question is, why is he using scare tactics to push through his bill.
On the other hand, his "greatest critic," Jackass O'Reilly, had the chance last night to point that out to his audience, which would have given him an extreme amount of credibility for his argument, but he didn't. My question is why, Bill, why? In my opinion, the Irish Fuck is on the same paycheck as the president. The Council on Foreign Relations. He is not reporting the news, he is just giving colorful commentary to keep the Republicans happy.
This Stimulus Bill is not what they say it is.
To be quite honest with you, I hope that Obama is what everyone say he is. Unfortunately, I don't trust anyone in government, regardless of color, age, creed or favorite type of breakfast cereal.
I really appreciate you taking part in this discussion. I will be the first to tell you I don't know the answer, but I encourage the people to ask questions. Chip Up!!
-
Permalink Reply by cory tate on -
DAMN THE IRS.
I went online to pay my taxes from a job I held for a couple months this year, where I was paid $2400, with $150 withheld from my pay for taxation and unemployment. When I got to the part where I calculate my tax owed, it showed that I owed $150.
When I lost my job, I attempted to apply for unemployment, and was denied on the basis that my base period pay wasn't enough. Shouldn't I get the money I put into unemployment compensation back, at least?
The system is faulty, and unconstitutional. I receive nothing back for the taxes which are withheld from my pay, and when I no longer get paid, I can't fall back on the money I put into the system to have money to live on while I search for a new job; yet I owe the government still more money?
BULLSHIT
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
Yes, I agree, and when you understand what voluntary compliance is on the tax form, you will really get mad.
-
Permalink Reply by Joyion on -
Yean anyone can read the constitution or any book. That doesn't mean that they truly understand it or interpreted the way it was meant to be.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
And it is that attitude that has allowed the wrong people to interpret it the wrong way. If you really think that just sitting idly by and being complacent is the right way to live, then there really is no hope of saving our country.
You are starting to sound like one of the "sheeple."
-
Permalink Reply by Tim on -
I respect you guys' opinion but you can't change anything..hes already president.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
I agree with you my friend. And you are right about filtering through the shit on youtube. The only reason I might know more about this than you, is because I got mad about it back in '96, when I read Behold a Pale Horse, by William Cooper. If you haven't read it, by all means, get it, and pay cash for it. That book was the center of my journey and still is today. Alex Jones likes to take credit for a lot of things that Cooper was screaming on short wave radio years before. Google the "Hour of The Times." He did 36 shows that will not only blow your mind, but put things in perspective for you. And then check out Chris White from Nowheretorun on youtube, and on podomatic.com. He was the one that got me into podcasting and checking my sources. There is so much more for us to talk about, but first, thank you for being who you are. You represent the truth, in yourself, and what we are searching for. Chip Up!!
-
Permalink Reply by thafooteklan on
-
Permalink Reply by mikeskatesnj on -
What the fuck. I want to live in a fucking village by myself on a farm. or some shit. I don't need no damn new world order. FUCK THA POLICE mo fuckas. and fuck new world order. it puts us into comprimise. and that's not how life shall be lived. not a chance
-
Permalink Reply by Jillian on -
This is why I don't vote, he came in and right away people saw him as the next President. He will fuck up things, immensely. You can talk about it until you are blue in the face, and it really won't make a difference. My book, there is a devil on earth and it's called the Government. We need a good ol' fashion war, to start from scratch, and to make people want to really live. Oh and fuck the media, there is so much currupt shit going on that we have no clue as to what is really being threaded. Or is it all a conspiracy, found in someone's pants? PS. Fuck socialism.
© 2009 Created by MyBerrics
