Why Not Trust Obama?
Why Not Trust Obama?Share
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Tags: conspiracy, government, obama
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Jason Whitfield on -
Actually, this a nation where the majority are Christians and is based on Christian values. Atleast it was meant to be based on that. It is merely opinion though, but an opinion that almost 80% would prolly agree on. I guess the better way to look at it is, we consider Ireland a Catholic state, or Iraq considered being an Islamic state. So the point i'm getting at is we're a Christian nation, not that our actual politics are Christian. Does that make more sense of my point?
-
Permalink Reply by Skobie on -
Not to side with Obama or anything, but the whole "we are not a christian nation" thing was completely taken out of context. He proceeded to explain that our country is a mix of all religions. this was saying this in front of a group of Muslims, i think to make the point that Muslims are welcome in our country or something like that, i tend to dose off when he talks cause he says a whole lot of nice sounding words that mean nothing but that is what i gathered from the whole dialog.
-
Permalink Reply by Jason Whitfield on
-
I see what you mean. I still feel like this is a Christian nation though, but I was quick to judge the context. Thanks for reminding me to take a step back and look at that. Question though, is anyone in the forums going to attend one of the Tea Parties on Wednesday.
-
Permalink Reply by cory tate on -
this is what I meant also when I said that this wasn't a strictly Christian nation
-
Permalink Reply by cory tate on
-
it does, but I like to think that we enjoy more religious freedoms than people in Iraq, and Ireland is a mainly Catholic country partially due to the British occupation that lasted several centuries, where the Britons' beliefs were forced upon them.
-
Permalink Reply by Chris Conn on -
hmmm interesting.
-
Permalink Reply by matell on
-
Well! Here's a #1 UK Brit Pop song called Bastille Soul & This Is What's Been Goin On - by yours truly Matell - check it out now!
-
Permalink Reply by Alan on -
i think the guy that started this discussion should change the title to "why not trust politicians/government" rather then just blame everythng on obama and his staff.... seems like everybody is trying to point the finger at someone rather than actually finding a solution to the problem...
-
Permalink Reply by Skobie on
-
NO NO NO. You are wrong in just about everyway. if you took the time to read what TK actually wrote and read the 16 pages of content, i know its alot to ask, but if you did you would see that obama and his staff are people who should not be trusted. Also, Ron Paul was the solution to the problem.
-
Permalink Reply by Alan on
-
Fuck ron paul!!! this has been going on since george washington... i'm talkin about the president appointing someone into office and then it backfires on him.... this is why i wrote to change the title to why not trust politicians because everyone is a lying backstabber.... its not just obama
© 2009 Created by MyBerrics
