Why Not Trust Obama?
Why Not Trust Obama?Share
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Today at 12:41am | Edit Note | Delete
Why not trust Obama? That seems to be the question that everyone has for me, recently. Well, I guess I should probably give some examples of why I don't have any faith in him. Just to be sure we understand each other. I mean, I wouldn't want you to be mislead by anything that I have to say, I will leave that for the mainstream media.
First off, let me say this. Just for the sake of argument. Birds of a feather, flock together. Have you ever heard this? Do you know what that means? How about this one, you will know a man by the company he keeps. Does that sound familiar? These are both old sayings, that our parents, school teachers and ministers the world over, have forced down our throats since day one of our lives. These are cute, catchy colloquialisms, that encourage us to keep a certain mindset through the course of our lives. And for the most part, they are always pretty close to being accurate. So why is this important?
Every person that Obama has appointed so far, has had some red flag about them go up. Take for example Rahm Emannuel. The former Clinton campaign manager wrote a book that called for the "mandatory servitude," of all citizens 18-25. That is something straight out of communist doctrine if you ask me. Not to mention the temper that guy supposedly has. How about the appointee for the position of Treasurer? This fellow Geithner, who is supposed to be handling the country's money, didn't pay his taxes. Does that make sense? How about Bill Richardson. The Governor of New Mexico and former Clinton administration member. He had to turn in his resignation recently because there seems to be some "questionable" actions in his past. How about Carol Browner. You know, the person Obama wants to be the new climate czar. (by the way, czar means king, so that must mean king or queen of climates, right?) She wrote a book calling for "global governance." But don't worry, Obama has said that won't have any effect on her ability to do the job. Of course not. Especially since the job is to get us in line for the "New World Order," that every newspaper around the world seems to have in their headlines these days.
And, what about Hillary? No controversy there. Unless you consider that she is still under indictment for illegal campaign funds during her 2001 run for Senate. Not to mention that she is also connected to the "Whitewatergate" scandal in Arkansas, possible drug connections and being married to Bill who has been called, "like a son," by George Bush Sr. I wonder if W. ever became jealous over Bill?
Now I know that we can't just hold Obama accountable for his friends. It is possible that he is a good guy lead astray by the wrong crowd. Right? Well if that is true, then why has it been reported that Obama will remove the global gag on the U.S. contributions to the UNFPA fund. Which is an organization that was reported to be performing "coercive abortions," in China. An organization that Colin Powell himself, had to investigate, because of the severity. And apparently, the severity was so bad that he recommended that America not support. Oh, by the way, "coercive," is a nice way of saying forced.
Here is something to add. Why did, Obama come out this weekend, and say that all of a sudden, the financial crisis is worse than he thought, and everyone, including him, was going to have to put their "agendas" aside, and address this issue first. What is his agenda? You realize of course, that he isn't President, yet he is still recommending these big buyouts. The first of which can't be accounted for. No one can explain where this fictional money that was given to the banks went, much less, why the banks aren't loaning it out to "stimulate" the economy. And, he is already calling for a new "stimulus" for the people. Who is going to pay this? The Fed is private and just sets the rates for money that has nothing real backing it. The banks are teetering on the brink of failing. The government is in debt way beyond "idiocracy," and the people are dumbfounded. Who is going to pay for this buyout?
And all of this, is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't gotten into Obama'a socialist healtcare plan, or his attempt at making a new SS. But these are conspiratorial concerns. They aren't quantifiable yet, since most of the information regarding those topics are speculative.
However, the information that was presented at the beginning of this argument, is found in the mainstream media. Which means, there is no reason why you guys aren't paying attention.
Tags: conspiracy, government, obama
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by mikeskatesnj on -
interesting. Hillary Clinton came to my school, or should I call her "Cunt"on. I don't trust the government and I probably will never pay my taxes and then just move out of the country to go somewhere else because apparently American Government is probably going to fuck things up nicely for the people more than it already has.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on -
Think about it like this, if they form a one world government, there will be nowhere to run. Bummer.
-
Permalink Reply by Cameron Wood on -
i just find this funny and no i am not racist or anything but watch this video...
-
Permalink Reply by Gurley on -
Find me one politician that hasn't done anything wrong in the past. The second one of these guys gets appointed everyone from current government staff to the press runs out and digs up every little thing that ever happened in their lives. I would have nightmares about being appointed to any position in the US government. Anybody not on my side is going to comb through my past and pull out anything bad or that could be spun in a bad way. They will present statements out of context, inflate negative impacts and associate you with things that you had no idea about. You really have to take all news stories with a grain of salt and not believe everything you see and hear.
As for the bailout, You better believe the government know exactly what those banks are doing with that money. That's the gov't's number 1 job, tracking money. There are provisions that we have no idea about. has anyone here actually seen the contract that was drawn up between the banks and Washington? Didn't think so. By the way, banks are starting to loosen restrictions on short term loans now. All that money has to be accounted for before they can start lending it out. Moving that much money doesn't happen overnight.
I'm not saying the bailout was a good idea and I'm not saying that everyone on capitol hill is an angel, I'm just saying that people need to be aware that nearly everything they see and hear from the media is the stone cold truth.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
I totally agree that you cannot believe the media. But making excuses for politicians is unacceptable. You can't just blame it on the media digging up stuff. The rhetoric that these individuals have used in the past contradicts the freedoms that we are promised in the constitution. Global governance and mandatory servitude were not and will not be promised by our constitution. These are not the type of people that we want running our government, because if they do, it will not be our government anymore.
thank you for your reply.
-
Permalink Reply by Joyion on -
Nobodies ever going to be good. They're humans. Tell me someone who is good enought to be in the government? Even if they're very good people, They probably don't have the right skills to run the goverment. When a person has a lot money and power, There's always going to be a good chance of them doing something bad.
-
Permalink Reply by Joyion on
-
You should at least give him a chance. ... What do you believe in? Who do you trust?
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
This may sound weird, but I believe everything that is happening is biblical. This one world government that seems to be forming was prophesied in old and new testament books. That is why I am so against every politician. I don't think that the ball that is rolling can be stopped. So my goal is to wake everyone up to what may be coming soon.
I don't believe in all this 2012 BS, and I am more inclined to believe that everything the established church has done with the Bible is wrong. In fact, I don't know what to tell you about what I believe, because it would be too strange to understand. I would recommend that you read what the Books of Daniel, Ezekiel and Revelation say and then make a decision for yourself as to what may or may not be happening.
Bottom line is, I have given politicians too many chances. It is time to try something else.
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
Shelece, I understand your pain, but please do not mistake me or my intentions. America is a beautiful place that gives us the freedom to hold these discussions with one another. Just because there are "Thieves are in the Temple," does not mean that the Temple is not sacred anymore. Who would have thought I could use a Prince song to explain politics. The only thing that we can do is educate ourselves for the future and to educate the public on how to truly seek "Change." Thank you for being involved with the discussion. Chip Up!!
-
Permalink Reply by TK Kyzer on
-
Excellent videos. This proves that they are doing it right in front of our eyes. The arrogance of these people is what will bring them down. Thank you for being involved.
© 2009 Created by MyBerrics
